Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/George Wright (programmer)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

George Wright (programmer)[edit]

  • I think this should be deleted, unless this guy is actually known outside of his school/area. Delete. (should be User:Cookiecaper)
  • I disagree. George Wright is a teenager genius. Looking at his list of programming achievements on his web page should highlight this. Keep (should be User:Ocohen)
    • If that qualifies as teenage genius, I must have known about ten of them. Delete Wyllium 15:11, 2004 Oct 17 (UTC)
  • I agree. I *am* George Wright and I think this page is totally absurd. I may have some programs which have been published and am a member of some online projects, but I really am not that well known. Delete. (should be User:Gwright)
  • Unless this page can get more detail, it should be deleted. If Mr. Wright is so meaningless as to have so little detail, then the page is meant to exist just to annoy him. Delete. (anon)
  • This is a non-notable vanity page, with no potential to become encyclopedic. Delete. (anon)
  • What the heck? I think User:Cookiecaper added {{VfD}} to this page, and it already has five votes even though it's not listed? Who on earth is looking at this? Cool Hand Luke (Communicate!) 01:55, 17 Oct 2004 (UTC)
  • Searching "George Wright" and "KDE" produces 1020 Google hits[1], and the majority of them seem to actually refer to this 16 year-old developer, but online development projects tend to do this. None of the hits seem to be very notable (i.e. actual news articles or some such), and there's just a lot of message board garbage. Delete.Cool Hand Luke (Communicate!) 01:49, 17 Oct 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete - this doesn't add to the sum of human knowledge. --ihatepotsmokinghippies 02:42, 17 Oct 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete: Not notable. potsmokinghippiesaddtohumanknowledge
  • Delete. Nothing to indicate exceptional achievement yet.--NathanHawking 06:58, 2004 Oct 17 (UTC)
  • Delete. Subject of the article isn't notable enough to be included in an encyclopedia.Gleffler 15:31, 17 Oct 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete, vanity/non-notable. A quiz program and a units converter? Good start, I suppose, but he'll have to do better. Gazpacho 22:36, 20 Oct 2004 (UTC)